Most of what is known of Egyptian Mathematics derives from a small amount of papyri that were compiled as pratical textbooks for the training of scribes at an advanced level of education. Our knowledge is derived from the following sources:

The Egyptian's use of math was more pratical than anything else, and used through out daily life. Listed below are some of the ways in which math was used:

The hieroglyphic decimal system that the Ancient Egyptians used had separate symbols for the numbers 1, 10, 100, 1,000 and 10,000(as can be seen in the graphics above), also there was no symbol for zero. Intermediate numbers were written as multiples of the single number. All mathematical procedures were based on the underlying processes of addition and subtraction.

As it seems, there are no traces of the use of multiplication tables. Although the multiplication and division of by ten was a standard pratice. The process for fractions was based on the addition and subtraction of unit fractions. In exception to the special cases of 2/3 and very rarely 3/4, the Egyptians did not use multiples of fractions, but only the single unit fration.

A great example of egyptian mathematics at work:

*The Army scribe, Amenemope, was challenged to calculate the number of men that would be needed to transport an obelisk of given size from the quarries, to errect a colossus in a given time, calculate the rations necessary to feed men digging a lake, and to arrange stores for a major military expedition to Syria.*

The Egyptian system of notation was decimal. It was in the manner in which fractions were expressed that the Egyptian system of notation shows such peculiar features, rendering their method of calculation so very different from ours. A fraction was represented by writing the mouth-sign, probably reading *ro* and meaning 'a part', above the number which we should describe as the denominator. In Egyptian, the number following the word *ro* had an ordinal meaning, and *ro*/5 means 'part five' or the 'fifth part', which concludes a row of equal parts together constituting a single set of five. As being the part which concluded the row into one series of the number indicated, the Egyptian *ro*-fraction was necessarily a fraction with, as we should say, unity as the numerator. To the Egyptian mind it would have seemed nonsense and self-contradictory to write *ro* 4/7, for in any series of seven, only one part could be the seventh, namely, that which occupied the seventh place in a row of seven equal parts laid out for inspection. The Egyptians, though he must have been able to realize, for example, what four parts out of seven meant, had to express 4/7 as 1/2 + 1/14; similarly, 11/49 had to be expressed as 1/7 + 1/14 + 1/98, or by other aliquot fractions giving the same sum.

*Copyright by Ancient Egyptian Lives ©1997-99, All Rights Reserved.*